At first we wanted to present you Top 100 things tha Evil Overlord should do. Then we have contacted Peter and he allowed to present you another 100. Thank You Peter! 76. If I have a fit of temporary insanity and decide to give the hero the chance to reject a job as my trusted lieutentant, I will retain enough sanity to wait until my current trusted lieutenant is out of earshot before making the offer..
77. I will not tell my Legions of Terror "And he must be taken alive!" The command will be "And try to take him alive if it is reasonably practical."
78. If my doomsday device happens to come with a reverse switch, as soon as it has been employed it will be melted down and made into limited-edition commemorative coins.
79. If my weakest troops fail to eliminate a hero, I will send out my best troops instead of wasting time with progressively stronger ones as he gets closer and closer to my fortress.
80. If I am fighting with the hero atop a moving platform, have disarmed him, and am about to finish him off and he glances behind me and drops flat, I too will drop flat instead of quizzically turning around to find out what he saw.
Long, long time ago. At film set not so far away. Lived Evil Overlord... And no single Hero. The End 51. I will hire a team of board-certified architects and surveyors to examine my castle and inform me of any secret passages and abandoned tunnels that I might not know about.
52. If the beautiful princess that I capture says "I’ll never marry you! Never, do you hear me, NEVER!!!", I will say "Oh well" and kill her.
53. I will not strike a bargain with a demonic being then attempt to double-cross it simply because I feel like being contrary. 54. The deformed mutants and odd-ball psychotics will have their place in my Legion of Terror. However before I send them out on important covert missions that require tact and subtlety, I will first see if there is anyone else equally qualified who would attract less attention.
One evening after attending the theatre, two gentlemen walking down the street, observed a rather well dressed and attractive woman walking just ahead of them. One man remarked to the other, "I’d give R100 to spend the night with that woman". The woman overheard the remark and she told the gentleman that she would take him up on it. After bidding his companion goodnight, the man accompanied the young lady to her apartment where they immediately went to bed.The following morning the man presented the lady with R50 as he prepared to leave. she demanded the rest of the money stating: "If you don’t give me the R100, I’ll sue you for it".
He laughed, "I’d like to see you get it on these grounds".
"Your Honour, my client, this young lady, is the owner of a piece of property, a garden spot surrounded by a profuse growth of shrubbery, which she agreed to rent for the sum of R100. The defendant took possession of the property, used it extensively for the purpose for which it was rented, but upon evacuation of the property, he paid only R50 of the agreed amount. The rent was not excessive since it was restricted property and we ask judgement be granted against the defendant to ensure payment of the balance.
The defendant’s lawyer was impressed and amused at the way in which his opponent had presented his case. His defense, therefore, was somewhat altered from the way he had originally planned to present it.
"Your Honour", my client agrees that the young lady has a fine piece of property, that he did rent such property, for a time, and a degree of pleasure was derived from the transaction. However, my client found a well on the property, around which he placed his own stones, sunk a shaft and erected a pump. All labour being performed solely by himself. We claim these improvements to the property were sufficient to affect the unpaid amount and the plaintiff was adequately compensated for rental of the said property. We ask therefore, that the case be dismissed.
The young lady’s lawyer responded,"Your Honour my client agrees that the defendant did find a well on her property and that he did make improvements such as my learned friend has described. However, had the decendent not known that the well existed on my client’s property, he would never have considered renting the property. Also upon evacuating the premised, the defendant removed the stones pulled out the shaft and took the pump with him. In doing so, he not only dragged his equipment through the shrubbery, but he left the hole much larger than it was prior to his occupancy, making it more accessible to young children. We therefore ask that judgement be granted".
VERDICT
The young lady was granted her R50.
Dobra, dobra. Chwila. Chcesz sobie skomentować lub ocenić komentujących?
Zaloguj się lub zarejestruj jako nieustraszony bojownik walczący z powagą